planqert.blogg.se

Housing and Urban Development, and the Forest Service with regard to the 2016 Rim Fire Recovery and Restoration Project on the Stanislaus National Forest and the California Biomass Project. This case concerns the combined efforts of the State of California, U.S. On June 16, the Eastern District of California issued a favorable decision to the Forest Service.

0003_20220616_EarthIslandInst_etal_v_Nash_etal_19-01420_EDCal_BiomassProj_OrderĬourt decision in Earth Island Institute v Nash (E.D.The case concerns the use of categorical exclusion 6 (for timber stand and wildlife improvement with commercial thinning) for the Cuddy Valley Project on the Los Padres National Forest, which was summarized here. On June 21, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals denied petition for rehearing en banc submitted by plaintiffs. 0002_20220621_MountainCommForFireSafety_etal_v_Elliott_20-55660_9thCir_CuddyProj_EnBancDeniedĬourt decision in Mountain Communities for Fire Safety v.The case concerns the alleged violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the Free Exercise Clause of the Constitution’s First Amendment, and a trust obligation imposed on the United States by the 1892 Treaty of Santa Fe between the Apache and the United States. On June 24, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court of Arizona’s decision denying plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction against the Oak Flat Resolution Copper land exchange on the Tonto National Forest. U.S Department of Agriculture, (9th Cir.) 0001_20220624_ApacheStronghold_v_UnitedStates_etal_21-15295_9thCir_OakFlatLandExchange_Tonto_DecisionĬourt decision in Apache Stronghold v.Here is the Forest Service summary: Litigation Weekly JEmail